Before You Bite: Is Pasture Raised Beef Nutritionally Worth the Price?
I was raised on a farm in the Midwest. We had a creek running through our 10 acres of pasture. The water brought hours of summer fun in addition to providing hydration for our animals as they grazed in the field. I showed horses for years as part of 4-H and enjoyed fresh beef thanks to the cow we would raise and butcher each year.
A recent conversation with Coach Nicole regarding grass-fed beef made me curious about how we raised our livestock. As I took a closer look at what those practices might have meant nutritionally for me and my family, I was surprised by what I found. Read on to learn what I discovered.
In the U.S., cattle start out eating grass. Many (about 75%) are grown to maturity with specially formulated grain-based feed, and cattle may be given antibiotics to prevent or treat disease. Likewise, both natural and/or synthetic hormones may be used to promote growth. Most cattle feed on pasture or hay in addition to grain. Some of those grass lands can be treated with pesticides that are ingested by the cattle as they eat.
Federal law requires all beef to be inspected by the USDA for wholesomeness which basically means it is safe and healthy. However not all beef must be graded. Grading is voluntary and based on various factors including the amount of marbling. Marbling is the white fat within the meat muscle. The greater the amount of marbling in beef, the higher grade assigned. Marbling makes beef more flavorful, tender and juicy but also adds saturated fat to the diet. About 2 percent of graded beef is USDA Prime. Consumers pay more for the prime grade compared to USDA Choice beef which is most prevalent in the supermarket. However, the lower priced and less marbled Choice beef is lower in saturated fat and slightly more nutritious.
For years, cattle farmers have found that corn-fed cows develop well-marbled flesh. Grass-fed cattle produce flesh that is lower in fat and marbling. Since the USDA grades beef in a way that rewards marbling, you can see why cattle farmers have continued with the grain feeding practice.
As we look beyond the voluntary USDA grade, we can easily see that the nutritional benefits (in addition to some environmental and animal welfare benefits) make grass-fed animals more attractive. Since grass-fed beef is lower in overall fat, it also provides few calories. A 6 ounce steak from a grass-fed steer can have 100 fewer calories than a 6-ounce steak from a grain-fed steer.
The meat of grass-fed animals has been found to have two to four times more omega-3 fatty acids than meat from grain-fed animals. Research has also found that meat and dairy from grass-fed animals is the richest known source of another type of good fat called “conjugated linoleic acid” or CLA (this will be a topic for another blog entry). These animals can provide three to five times more CLA than animals fed conventional diets. Grass-fed animals have also been found to provide four times as much vitamin E compared with conventionally fed animals.
Unfortunately it isn’t as simple as grain-fed or grass-fed cows. There are many combinations in between. Each of these various feeding practice combinations leads to different beef labels at the supermarket. So here is some basic information to help you select the most nutritious beef for your money. That might mean you pay more per pound, but it may result in more nutrition for your dollar as well.
Conventional Beef - typically raised using hormones, antibiotics, pesticides and feed lot/grain practices as part of raising the cattle. The beef may be certified as USDA Beef but could not be certified organic.
Natural Beef - could be raised using hormones, antibiotics, or pesticides and would typically use feed lots/grain feeding. The beef may be certified as USDA Beef but could not be certified organic.
Organic Beef - would not be raised using hormones, antibiotics, or pesticides but could include feed lots/grain feeding. This group would also include “grass finished” cattle and would be categorized as certified organic and could be certified as USDA Beef.
Grass-Fed Beef - would not be raised using hormones, antibiotics, pesticides or feed lots/grain feeding. This beef, however, would also not be certified as organic but could be certified as USDA. Beef.
Organic Grass-Fed Beef would be raised without hormones, antibiotics, pesticides, or feed lots/grain feeding. This beef would be certified as organic but perhaps not USDA Beef.
So what I discovered is that we raised our cows using a natural beef method. They were pasture and grain fed to produce the desired marbled meat. No hormones or pesticides were used, but occasionally an antibiotic was needed. So the beef I was raised on was U.S. certified but not certified organic and fairly nutritious but not optimal.
I will now pay a little more attention to beef labeling as I shop for my family. When given the opportunity, I may pay the slightly higher price for organically grass-fed beef knowing it will provide slightly more nutrition for my family.
Weigh in on what you think. Is it worth the additional money for less marbled but slightly more nutritious beef?
A recent conversation with Coach Nicole regarding grass-fed beef made me curious about how we raised our livestock. As I took a closer look at what those practices might have meant nutritionally for me and my family, I was surprised by what I found. Read on to learn what I discovered.
In the U.S., cattle start out eating grass. Many (about 75%) are grown to maturity with specially formulated grain-based feed, and cattle may be given antibiotics to prevent or treat disease. Likewise, both natural and/or synthetic hormones may be used to promote growth. Most cattle feed on pasture or hay in addition to grain. Some of those grass lands can be treated with pesticides that are ingested by the cattle as they eat.
Federal law requires all beef to be inspected by the USDA for wholesomeness which basically means it is safe and healthy. However not all beef must be graded. Grading is voluntary and based on various factors including the amount of marbling. Marbling is the white fat within the meat muscle. The greater the amount of marbling in beef, the higher grade assigned. Marbling makes beef more flavorful, tender and juicy but also adds saturated fat to the diet. About 2 percent of graded beef is USDA Prime. Consumers pay more for the prime grade compared to USDA Choice beef which is most prevalent in the supermarket. However, the lower priced and less marbled Choice beef is lower in saturated fat and slightly more nutritious.
For years, cattle farmers have found that corn-fed cows develop well-marbled flesh. Grass-fed cattle produce flesh that is lower in fat and marbling. Since the USDA grades beef in a way that rewards marbling, you can see why cattle farmers have continued with the grain feeding practice.
As we look beyond the voluntary USDA grade, we can easily see that the nutritional benefits (in addition to some environmental and animal welfare benefits) make grass-fed animals more attractive. Since grass-fed beef is lower in overall fat, it also provides few calories. A 6 ounce steak from a grass-fed steer can have 100 fewer calories than a 6-ounce steak from a grain-fed steer.
The meat of grass-fed animals has been found to have two to four times more omega-3 fatty acids than meat from grain-fed animals. Research has also found that meat and dairy from grass-fed animals is the richest known source of another type of good fat called “conjugated linoleic acid” or CLA (this will be a topic for another blog entry). These animals can provide three to five times more CLA than animals fed conventional diets. Grass-fed animals have also been found to provide four times as much vitamin E compared with conventionally fed animals.
Unfortunately it isn’t as simple as grain-fed or grass-fed cows. There are many combinations in between. Each of these various feeding practice combinations leads to different beef labels at the supermarket. So here is some basic information to help you select the most nutritious beef for your money. That might mean you pay more per pound, but it may result in more nutrition for your dollar as well.
Conventional Beef - typically raised using hormones, antibiotics, pesticides and feed lot/grain practices as part of raising the cattle. The beef may be certified as USDA Beef but could not be certified organic.
Natural Beef - could be raised using hormones, antibiotics, or pesticides and would typically use feed lots/grain feeding. The beef may be certified as USDA Beef but could not be certified organic.
Organic Beef - would not be raised using hormones, antibiotics, or pesticides but could include feed lots/grain feeding. This group would also include “grass finished” cattle and would be categorized as certified organic and could be certified as USDA Beef.
Grass-Fed Beef - would not be raised using hormones, antibiotics, pesticides or feed lots/grain feeding. This beef, however, would also not be certified as organic but could be certified as USDA. Beef.
Organic Grass-Fed Beef would be raised without hormones, antibiotics, pesticides, or feed lots/grain feeding. This beef would be certified as organic but perhaps not USDA Beef.
So what I discovered is that we raised our cows using a natural beef method. They were pasture and grain fed to produce the desired marbled meat. No hormones or pesticides were used, but occasionally an antibiotic was needed. So the beef I was raised on was U.S. certified but not certified organic and fairly nutritious but not optimal.
I will now pay a little more attention to beef labeling as I shop for my family. When given the opportunity, I may pay the slightly higher price for organically grass-fed beef knowing it will provide slightly more nutrition for my family.
Weigh in on what you think. Is it worth the additional money for less marbled but slightly more nutritious beef?
![]() You will earn 3 SparkPoints |







.jpg)
























Comments
http://bit.ly/HW5Oc
It's okay that vegans and vegetarians don't eat meat: more meat for the meat eaters. It's part of world order/balance. I was vegetarian for the most part for my entire life and since my celiac diagnosis have learned to eat meat for the nutrients. I'm grateful for the conscientious farmer who raises grass-fed cows. It sustains me. - 3/6/2010 10:35:21 AM
Scary vegetarians- grab a burger and enjoy an all-American meal."
Sigh. Such ignorance.
We are not "humanizing" animals. For one, humans ARE animals so the statement is already muddled. Non-human animals are sentient and intelligent. They have feelings that are similar to ours. This makes scientific, evolutionary sense. Pain, fear, unease - these all have survival value. In social animals the ability to bond, help one another and work together also has survival value. The animals we eat are social, feeling beings. It is not "humanizing" them to acknowledge that these are individual, thinking, emotive beings who are not so unlike us. They fear, feel pain, feel love for their babies, have friends, mourn when a pack member dies, etc.
I, for one, don't understand why folks insist on making non-human animals out to be automatons in this day and age. That's so Descartes.
Also, I like my burgers All- American. Amy's makes a great 'All American' veggie burger. Yum! Let's not confuse patriotism with dietary choices. I'm no less an American because I'm vegan. It's insulting to insinuate otherwise.
If you choose to eat meat, choose the most humanely raised meat you can afford. You may end up eating less but that's better for you anyway. Humans eat too many animal products.
Good article. Would like to see one on eggs since they are a notoriously cruel industry with a lot of misleading labeling going on. - 10/19/2009 6:01:18 PM
Scary vegetarians- grab a burger and enjoy an all-American meal. - 3/18/2009 5:26:35 PM
Thanks - 2/22/2009 7:36:26 PM
I will tell you a simple truth: If you want them to change how they treat the cattle, stop donating to PETA, and start buying the expensive all-organic grass fed, free range beef. When a person goes to manage his or her farm, the bottom line is, /what can I sell?/ ...and if the heavily marbled factory-produced stuff flies off the shelves while the 'good' stuff goes bad and unsold... they take that as YOU saying YOU want the factory-farmed meat. ...the day a Butcher/Store tells a supplier, "I don't need any more of that ground stuff, I've got plenty- I'm out of those organic steaks- get me some more of those" is the day that supplier tells your business owners "I have more need of organics, and am willing to buy it if you have it"... and that will be the day those practices CHANGE!
I can also say that most people who use those same heavy growth hormones and who lot-feed and mixed-feed feed, and who use antibiotics regularly do not usually eat those cattle. ;) They don't buy store-sold beef. They prefer to raise one or two head for themselves, using antibiotics only if they need to, and never using growth hormones or mixed feeds, just plain old pasture... that's what they eat.
I'm just sayin'... if you want to know how it is on the 'inside', that's how it is. DEMAND is what drives this issue, not morals or health facts... they're going to keep making twinkies too, as long as we buy them and eat them. :P - 10/2/2008 1:00:23 AM
Thank you for this eye opening article... - 9/30/2008 4:32:29 PM
Despite what Americans want to believe, the USDA reps are NOT able to inspect all beef, and have actually been prevented from doing so at some of the largest meat packing companies. (In researching his book Fast Food Nation, Eric Schlosser spoke with both the FDA and the Justice Department about this issue.)
The problems with factory farming aren't just related to animal rights or the health and safety (or lack thereof) of meat. Factory farms have created socioeconomic problems, environmental problems, health problems ... you name it.
At some point Americans are going to have to recognize that cheap and easy access to just about ANYTHING has a tremendous downside, and we need to be aware of that.
I have no problem with people eating meat as long as they don't delude themselves into thinking that it's safe and healthy, and that the animal led a fulfilling and happy existence up to the point of slaughter.
- 9/30/2008 3:13:02 PM
There are many reasons to buy organic and locally grown foods and I'm very happy to be able to support organics and contribute to a local business. - 9/30/2008 11:11:46 AM
I can truly say that this article is an eye opener for me...I do not eat beef---rarely. I tried organic buffalo, and loved it and now have tried organic beef at Costco....so this article opens my eyes as to what to look for and expect.
Thank you very much for this article.... - 9/30/2008 10:55:57 AM
Thanks for the information!! - 9/30/2008 10:32:53 AM
After college I worked selling boxed beef for one of the largest packers in the country. Training for that job I spent 6 months in a packing plant. Recently I have read so much about USDA only inspects a portion of the animals which is not true at all. There are so many USDA people and they inspect all animals.
I am also reading the book "Skinny B%$*!" and there is so much stuff in there that is not even accurate. That is not the way that it works in the large packing plants. There are USDA people everywhere watching and making sure of everything. These people also go to a lot of work to make sure that everything is clean, sanitized and sterile. - 9/30/2008 9:54:59 AM
- 9/30/2008 3:36:49 AM
- 9/29/2008 2:11:53 PM
all in all we just enjoy knowing that our food is wholesome and that the animals we raise for our food had a great life with green grass and sunshine and was treated humanely and with respect.
I personally find the marbling of a grain-finished cow to be much better than strictly fgrass-fed. - 9/28/2008 10:49:54 PM
If you want good beef, you need to buy from Nebraska. - 9/28/2008 9:19:53 PM
I was a science teacher until recently, when I became a consultant. I am constantly appalled at the kinds of beliefs people hold that are largely hearsay, and have only loose connections with academic research; and if questioned, they cite research that is not creditable. Present scholarly research is bravely showing flaws in the common myths such as; the cholesterol in eggs makes them a forbidden food; that the fats in meat are life-threatening; that butter is prohibited in favor of olive oil. Do not fall for un-scientific research, as so many groups have agendas that dictate the outcomes! Stick with rigorous, reproducible, double-blind studies done by authentic, respectable institutions. For goodness sake, have a wholesome diet! There is much to be learned. - 9/28/2008 8:52:53 PM
Please Log In To Leave A Comment: Log in now ›