Children's T.V. Choices Could Affect How Much They Eat
I'll admit it: I'm a snacker. For as long as I can remember, I'm someone who doesn't go more than a few hours without eating. I can't imagine eating breakfast at 6 a.m., and then waiting until 11 or 12 to eat again. I think my body would go into shock or blow up or something. As my daughter gets older, she's becoming just like me. "Mama, let's have a snack," she'll say, right around the time I'm thinking "Geez, I'm hungry. I wonder what I could have to eat."
I try to make our snacks as healthy as possible (fruit, veggies, granola bars, yogurt, etc.) Although I don't have to worry because my daughter doesn't watch T.V. yet, a new study shows a link between what kids are seeing on T.V. and how much they eat. So if you've got a young snacker at home who likes to watch T.V., or a child who eats meals in front of the tube, you'll want to keep a close eye on just how much they are consuming.
This study, conducted by the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale, involved 118 children between the ages of 7 and 11. Each child was given a bowl of Goldfish crackers and allowed to watch a cartoon. One group was shown ads for games and entertainment during the commercial breaks. The other was shown ads for junk food like potato chips and fruit roll-ups. The group who saw the food ads ate 45% more Goldfish than the group that saw the game ads. The results suggest a correlation between how much someone eats and what they are watching on T.V. My guess is that a study of adults would yield similar results.
Do you or your children eat meals or snacks in front of the T.V.? Have you ever noticed a correlation between what you (or your child) are watching and how much you're eating?
I try to make our snacks as healthy as possible (fruit, veggies, granola bars, yogurt, etc.) Although I don't have to worry because my daughter doesn't watch T.V. yet, a new study shows a link between what kids are seeing on T.V. and how much they eat. So if you've got a young snacker at home who likes to watch T.V., or a child who eats meals in front of the tube, you'll want to keep a close eye on just how much they are consuming.
This study, conducted by the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale, involved 118 children between the ages of 7 and 11. Each child was given a bowl of Goldfish crackers and allowed to watch a cartoon. One group was shown ads for games and entertainment during the commercial breaks. The other was shown ads for junk food like potato chips and fruit roll-ups. The group who saw the food ads ate 45% more Goldfish than the group that saw the game ads. The results suggest a correlation between how much someone eats and what they are watching on T.V. My guess is that a study of adults would yield similar results.
Do you or your children eat meals or snacks in front of the T.V.? Have you ever noticed a correlation between what you (or your child) are watching and how much you're eating?
![]() You will earn 3 SparkPoints |
NEXT ENTRY > You Asked: Is Muscle Milk Good for You?
































Comments
8/9/2009
7:36:12 PM
My son is allowed to eat watching TV only as a special treat, but never on a regular basis - we did this for a while at first because I didn't have a table or a separate place to eat, but once we moved to our new house, the new rule was eating at the table. Additionally, we only watch videos without commercials (except, of course, those they sneak in at the beginning), so mostly my son is not affected by the advertising. But, like a previous poster said, sometimes he'll ask for whatever it is the character on TV is eating or doing - luckily, most of the characters eat healthy snacks, so I'll agree and give him a little, but it really depends. Lately, I've decided to test how much he really wants the snack and tell him he can have it IF and only if he gets up to get it himself. I'm hoping this will help him decide whether or not he really is hungry enough or if he's just responding to what he's seeing on TV.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~
I think a rule of only eating at the table is a good one to uphold, because kids will not be willing to miss thier show to go to the table to eat a snack, which means they are not really hungry after all. ;) And if they are really hungry they won't mind going to the table to eat it. - 4/9/2010 4:44:24 AM
Food advertising is so manipulative and nothing is sacred. Not only are children exposed to incessant ads for snack foods but even diet programs use food in an attempt to draw people in. One of the major players in the diet game runs an ad about "hunger," in this case represented by a furry creature shoving food under someone's nose. Last time I got a hunger craving from watching TV, it was that commercial that did it. - 8/3/2009 12:26:35 AM
I agree with the study; I think you do, unconsciously, eat more if you are in front of the tv. - 8/2/2009 11:54:39 AM
I have found that commercials for food (especially sweets..........chocolate!) make my cravings worse when I am really trying hard to cut back. So, I fully agree with the results of the study! - 8/1/2009 11:02:22 PM
We eat breakfast at 8am, snack at 10, lunch at noon, snack at 2, dinner at 4, snack at 6pm... then nothing until breakfast again. - 8/1/2009 8:45:11 PM
On a side note: when I do watch network TV and food commercials come on, I have to still consciously tell myself that I'm not hungry when my mouth starts watering. - 8/1/2009 6:56:28 PM
Television, especially for the age group in the study, is more of a cheap babysitter than quality programming.
And those ads!! They are specifically designed for that age group and presented in a manner that kids simply can't resist! Set limits on TV - and TV game - times.
Get the kids outside to play - activity, not endless hours in front of the TV, will keep the kids healthy. Healthy snacks will keep their energy up for that active play. - 8/1/2009 2:13:53 PM
I love, love, love to read cookbooks and watch FoodNetwork and other similar shows as well as have subscriptions to a couple food related mags. Most all of my cookbooks these days are healthy cooking, but I love the challenge of taking something really high cal, high fat, unhealthy and turning the recipe into a good healthful one.
Before SP was a totally different story. An entire regular bag of xtra butter pop corn, the bag of ruffles, an entire carton of Haagen Daaz, a whole row of double stuff oreos....I don't even buy the stuff anymore. LOL, my other half loves popcorn, ICCM and chocolate. I make him keep the ice cream in the deep freeze outside, the chocolate is buried under fruits in the fridge and on popcorn night....he pops the bag, I scoop 15 pieces out and make him put the bowl on the other side of himself.
Mahalo nui loa SP for showing me the way!!! - 8/1/2009 3:22:03 AM
I could definitely see a problem with commercials.... I know that they affect me (oh the pizza ones) as well as programs (FoodNetwork) that have wonderful foods on them. Although i can honestly say since starting SP I've started to watch a LOT less TV, and am usually on here messing around or doing my exercises or chasing my son. - 7/31/2009 10:12:08 PM
I do however, have a dvd player (besides my laptop) and I have noticed that if I'm watching something and there's food in it (usually there is) I want to snack on something.
So recently I made the choice of having apples, grapes, peaches, or a smoothie, something like that ready if I'm going to watch a movie and then I feel nutritionally safer. - 7/31/2009 7:16:05 PM
I also mostly watch Stargate SG1 on DVD or other TV shows on DVD - no commercials!
Heck, I won't eat half the stuff they advertise anyway. Anytime meat or cheese pops up in ads (and it's a lot!) I just feel sick to my stomach. Not in the mood to nosh after that. Heh. - 7/31/2009 3:44:58 PM
Please Log In To Leave A Comment: Log in now ›