In the News: California to Require Chains to Post Calories
Last week, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a bill into law that requires all restaurant chains with more than 20 units in the state to post nutritional information.
The law, which will affect more than 17,000 restaurants, begins next year. Starting in July 2009, restaurants much provide brochures with nutritional info, and by January 2011, all menus and menu boards above registers must include calories for each item. (Interestingly enough, the Govern-ator signed the bill in front of a Chili's restaurant!)
New York City implemented a similar law earlier this year, and it hasn't really affected the bottom line for restaurants (though with the current financial situation the real effect of the program remains to be seen).
Do you think that posting nutritional info makes a difference? According to a study in the American Journal of Public Health:
Americans spend 47.9% of their food budget on restaurant food.
People who dine at fast-food restaurants eat there about twice a week.
Consumers routinely make decisions based on the nutrition labels of supermarket foods.
We know that New York now posts nutrition info on menu boards, and in France, the nutrition info is printed on fast food bags, boxes and wrappers. I've blogged about that topic in the past. After a night on the town in Paris, my sister wanted Mac-Do, as McDonald's is often called in France, so I indulged her. We were amused, upon sitting down, to find that her sandwich had 440 calories, according to the box it came in. I snapped a blurry photo between chuckles. Did the nutrition info dissuade her? Nope. She was craving some greasy American fast food.
I never eat fast food, and she rarely does, and usually then it's to fulfill a craving. Most of my friends are the same way: They rarely eat fast food, but if they do, it's to satisfy a craving. Calories, schmalories, they want that Big Mac, Burrito Supreme or Whopper! Posting calories likely wouldn't squelch that craving.
However, my extended family frequents chain restaurants, which I generally try to avoid. When I go out to eat with them, I generally have a hard time finding something healthy. I'd LOVE to know how many calories I'm eating at the chains.
What do you think about nutritional content on restaurant menus? Would it deter you from eating somewhere or steer you toward better choices?
Photo: PRphotos.com
The law, which will affect more than 17,000 restaurants, begins next year. Starting in July 2009, restaurants much provide brochures with nutritional info, and by January 2011, all menus and menu boards above registers must include calories for each item. (Interestingly enough, the Govern-ator signed the bill in front of a Chili's restaurant!)
New York City implemented a similar law earlier this year, and it hasn't really affected the bottom line for restaurants (though with the current financial situation the real effect of the program remains to be seen).
Do you think that posting nutritional info makes a difference? According to a study in the American Journal of Public Health:
We know that New York now posts nutrition info on menu boards, and in France, the nutrition info is printed on fast food bags, boxes and wrappers. I've blogged about that topic in the past. After a night on the town in Paris, my sister wanted Mac-Do, as McDonald's is often called in France, so I indulged her. We were amused, upon sitting down, to find that her sandwich had 440 calories, according to the box it came in. I snapped a blurry photo between chuckles. Did the nutrition info dissuade her? Nope. She was craving some greasy American fast food.
I never eat fast food, and she rarely does, and usually then it's to fulfill a craving. Most of my friends are the same way: They rarely eat fast food, but if they do, it's to satisfy a craving. Calories, schmalories, they want that Big Mac, Burrito Supreme or Whopper! Posting calories likely wouldn't squelch that craving.
However, my extended family frequents chain restaurants, which I generally try to avoid. When I go out to eat with them, I generally have a hard time finding something healthy. I'd LOVE to know how many calories I'm eating at the chains.
What do you think about nutritional content on restaurant menus? Would it deter you from eating somewhere or steer you toward better choices?
Photo: PRphotos.com
![]() You will earn 3 SparkPoints |
NEXT ENTRY > We Tried It: Kashi TLC Cereal Bars
































Comments
its the public really educated on the concept of total calories per day? perhaps an additional posting of fat percentage may be more relate-able, even if it is just to compare one food to the next. - 5/19/2010 9:37:19 AM
I wish it would go into effect nationwide, not just California. - 4/30/2009 9:00:34 PM
Shine on, Golden State. - 4/28/2009 1:35:44 PM
I'm not a big government person. Discloser leads to an inform public but it will never end stupidity. Do we really need a seat belt law?!?! We live in a state that doesn't have a seat belt law pertaining to adults but buckle up before starting the engine. - 4/11/2009 11:44:33 AM
We also rarely eat out, but when I do it is reaaly hard to know what you are eating. If I know the restaurant we are going to in advance, I try to visit their web site for nutritional info. A lot of times they will have the info on-line even if it isn't available in the restaurant itself. That helps, but it sure isn't convienent.
I also agree with most of the other comments, in that a lot of people will simply ignore the information provided (Don't ask- Don't tell), but for the rest of us it will be an indespensible tool.
- 4/6/2009 11:05:40 AM
I've gotten to the point that if we're going out, I pull up the menu and nutrition information of a restraunt and decide what I will have before even leaving the house. Sometimes the choice includes a plan to request a box when the meal is delivered and putting half of the entree in the box to enjoy the next day for lunch. ;D - 4/5/2009 11:56:30 PM
I know some people think that it is the government's job to control what we do to ourselves by doing things like overtaxing or outlawing things that are bad for us, but it isn't. What the government can do however, is to force restaurants to do the same thing that packaged food manufacturers have done for decades now, and that is, reveal the content of the foods and the nutritionals so that we can make our own INFORMED decisions. - 1/11/2009 1:26:35 PM
eating establishments. I love Chinese and Japanese food but the lack of information on it makes it off limits. - 1/7/2009 12:40:27 PM
*Full Disclosure - I definitely need to exercise more! - 11/29/2008 12:49:47 AM
I love it and I miss it when I travel. It really helps me stick to my diet plan better and I'm excited it's being instituted elsewhere. - 11/20/2008 5:09:22 PM
- 10/14/2008 11:08:56 AM
People who dine at fast-food restaurants eat there about twice a week."
WHAT!? Holy smokes! This does not represent me.
Good job, California. I look forward to my area following suit shortly. - 10/14/2008 10:38:08 AM
In regular restaurants it would just be guestimates on calorie counts since each cook/chef does things a little differently but chains are all the same.
- 10/13/2008 12:34:12 PM
Please Log In To Leave A Comment: Log in now ›