Poll: What's Your Definition of Moderation?
Moderation. It's a word that you'll often hear when you're trying to lose weight or live a healthier lifestyle. The more you read and learn about healthy habits, the more this word comes up. We're told to eat in moderation, drink in moderation and even exercise in moderation (or at a moderate intensity level. Moderation means that nothing—not even the foods that you know are bad for you and might even hurt your efforts—is off limits. You can lose weight and eat ice cream, too—as long as you do so in moderation. Sounds doable, right?
Why moderation? Well, it works for most people. It's difficult to give up foods you enjoy (after all, food should be pleasurable) forever; and making certain foods completely off limits often causes you to want them—and obsess over them—even more, which could derail your diet. Moderation may sound ordinary or boring, but it's a great way to lose weight, eat better, and still have some fun along the way.
Lately though, I've been thinking about this whole concept of moderation quite a bit. I'm wondering if moderation is very good advice. After all, no one ever really defines it for you. What YOU think is moderation might not be what all the health and nutrition experts have in mind when they counsel you to eat fill-in-the-blank in moderation. Does moderation mean eating a 2,000-calorie fast food value meal once a week or is that still too often? Does eating ice cream in moderation mean having a smaller 100-calorie serving most days? Is a single diet soda per day moderation, or should you drink it less often? If you're applying the concept of moderation to LOTS of food or food groups (high-fat foods, trans fats, desserts, sweet snacks, salty foods, high-fat cuts of meat, etc.) you could be eating small amount of several different unhealthy foods regularly, which means you're not really eating unhealthy foods (as a group) in moderation at all.
So I've been wondering: What does 'moderation' mean to YOU?
I think that we all have our own ideas about what moderation really means. We know that it means avoiding extremes, but should there be more to it?
Consider applying moderation to the "80/20" rule (some people prefer a 90/10 rule though) of healthy eating as an example. Most experts think that if people eat wholesome, healthy foods 80% of the time, and enjoy "other" foods (sometimes referred to as "fun" foods) 20% of the time that they have a healthy relationship with food and are likely consuming a nutrient-rich diet that allows for fun foods in moderation.
But are we talking each day? If so, that means you could spend 300 calories' worth of your daily budget (for a 1,500-calorie diet) on junk. Is that good advice? Should we really be eating 300 calories worth of junk or sugary foods (that's equal to more than 18 teaspoons of sugar) each day and saying that it's healthy to do so?
Does moderation mean eating nothing but healthy foods for 80% of each week? That equals about 5 1/2 days of healthy foods before you can indulge in something on the only-eat-this-in-moderation list. Should it be less frequently than that, such as monthly? If so, that means going 24 days (80% of the month) without "cheating" (I use that term loosely) before you're able to enjoy an ice cream cone (or similar), then going more than 3 weeks again before you enjoy another treat.
Maybe moderation has more to do with portion sizes. You may have eaten a whole chocolate candy bar in the past, but now you can enjoy just a bite and space it out over a few days. Is that moderation?
As you can see, moderation isn't quite so simple. It can mean different things to different people, so I think it's important for you to think about what moderation really means for you. Many of us could be fooling ourselves into thinking that we eat healthy foods liberally and unhealthy ones moderately when we really don't. That could hurt your health and your weight-loss efforts.
Personally, I try to make a conscious effort to eat healthy foods the vast majority most of the time, but I don't set any rules or timelines for myself that dictates how often I can eat my favorite candy (it's strawberry Twizzlers by the way, so thank you in advance for sending your care packages to Nicole at SparkPeople hehe) or how much I can have. Instead, I try to avoid foods that don't enhance my health most of the time. If a craving arises and I really want something, I'll eat it without guilt or concern as long as I've otherwise been adhering to a healthy diet. That's moderation to me—keeping healthy choices in the forefront of my mind, turning down "fun" foods most of the time (hey, they're everywhere!), and enjoying those favorites occasionally, whether it's weekly, monthly, or, occasionally more often.
How about you: What's your idea of eating in moderation? Can someone else define what moderation means for you? Does it (or should it) have a single definition that applies to everyone?
Why moderation? Well, it works for most people. It's difficult to give up foods you enjoy (after all, food should be pleasurable) forever; and making certain foods completely off limits often causes you to want them—and obsess over them—even more, which could derail your diet. Moderation may sound ordinary or boring, but it's a great way to lose weight, eat better, and still have some fun along the way.
Lately though, I've been thinking about this whole concept of moderation quite a bit. I'm wondering if moderation is very good advice. After all, no one ever really defines it for you. What YOU think is moderation might not be what all the health and nutrition experts have in mind when they counsel you to eat fill-in-the-blank in moderation. Does moderation mean eating a 2,000-calorie fast food value meal once a week or is that still too often? Does eating ice cream in moderation mean having a smaller 100-calorie serving most days? Is a single diet soda per day moderation, or should you drink it less often? If you're applying the concept of moderation to LOTS of food or food groups (high-fat foods, trans fats, desserts, sweet snacks, salty foods, high-fat cuts of meat, etc.) you could be eating small amount of several different unhealthy foods regularly, which means you're not really eating unhealthy foods (as a group) in moderation at all.
So I've been wondering: What does 'moderation' mean to YOU?
I think that we all have our own ideas about what moderation really means. We know that it means avoiding extremes, but should there be more to it?
Consider applying moderation to the "80/20" rule (some people prefer a 90/10 rule though) of healthy eating as an example. Most experts think that if people eat wholesome, healthy foods 80% of the time, and enjoy "other" foods (sometimes referred to as "fun" foods) 20% of the time that they have a healthy relationship with food and are likely consuming a nutrient-rich diet that allows for fun foods in moderation.
But are we talking each day? If so, that means you could spend 300 calories' worth of your daily budget (for a 1,500-calorie diet) on junk. Is that good advice? Should we really be eating 300 calories worth of junk or sugary foods (that's equal to more than 18 teaspoons of sugar) each day and saying that it's healthy to do so?
Does moderation mean eating nothing but healthy foods for 80% of each week? That equals about 5 1/2 days of healthy foods before you can indulge in something on the only-eat-this-in-moderation list. Should it be less frequently than that, such as monthly? If so, that means going 24 days (80% of the month) without "cheating" (I use that term loosely) before you're able to enjoy an ice cream cone (or similar), then going more than 3 weeks again before you enjoy another treat.
Maybe moderation has more to do with portion sizes. You may have eaten a whole chocolate candy bar in the past, but now you can enjoy just a bite and space it out over a few days. Is that moderation?
As you can see, moderation isn't quite so simple. It can mean different things to different people, so I think it's important for you to think about what moderation really means for you. Many of us could be fooling ourselves into thinking that we eat healthy foods liberally and unhealthy ones moderately when we really don't. That could hurt your health and your weight-loss efforts.
Personally, I try to make a conscious effort to eat healthy foods the vast majority most of the time, but I don't set any rules or timelines for myself that dictates how often I can eat my favorite candy (it's strawberry Twizzlers by the way, so thank you in advance for sending your care packages to Nicole at SparkPeople hehe) or how much I can have. Instead, I try to avoid foods that don't enhance my health most of the time. If a craving arises and I really want something, I'll eat it without guilt or concern as long as I've otherwise been adhering to a healthy diet. That's moderation to me—keeping healthy choices in the forefront of my mind, turning down "fun" foods most of the time (hey, they're everywhere!), and enjoying those favorites occasionally, whether it's weekly, monthly, or, occasionally more often.
How about you: What's your idea of eating in moderation? Can someone else define what moderation means for you? Does it (or should it) have a single definition that applies to everyone?
![]() You will earn 3 SparkPoints |
NEXT ENTRY > Playing with My Unhappiness
































Comments
Could someone please tell my insides what it is when I crave for something sweet during the evening?! :-(
Seriously, when I do crave for something sweet I have about 10 M & Ms which, I woudn't have thought was tooo bad.
Have a wonderful Christmas everyone.....in moderation! - 11/25/2010 6:50:59 PM
So im confused, i dont know what the right amount of food i should eat.
So i eat when im hungry, at least if i know what hunger feel like :( - 8/26/2010 5:30:11 AM
Just remember to write down everything you eat. Seeing spikes in our numbers in certain areas means that we may not be as mindful as we could be. - 5/14/2010 11:23:43 AM
While cutting out all treats usually only works for a short while, sometimes it is necessary to do so to sort of re-set your food concepts. And, if you really crave something it may be easier to avoid it all together than to have just a bit. - 5/12/2010 8:13:18 AM
My "moderation" is just about not feeling deprived, and I try to limit it to only three "treats" a week. Yeah, last week I had a brownie sundae after my doctoral recital (I'm a musician), but I can't even remember the last time I had a brownie sundae. It might have been after I gave my masters recital two years ago! But for me, a treat also means having a small serving of potatoes or the sticky rice with my Thai dinner.
I'll admit, once a day doesn't sound like moderation to me, unless it's truly a taste, and the least of all evils, like a square of dark chocolate. I just try to listen to my body. Something gets tempting, and I try to silence the voice in my head and simply ask, does my body want this right now. If I think about how junk food makes me feel, the answer is often no. It's much easier to accept that I don't want something than it is to accept that I can't have something. - 5/4/2010 8:49:27 AM
For me moderation is eating less of the bad things for me. i've taken a few things out of my diet that were for taste (such a crutons in my salad, i'd rather have a whole piece of toast then a few crutons). But i still allow myself a little sweet after dinner, whether it's a little dark chocolate shaved ontop of my strawberries, or it's the popcorn during a movie on a friday night (i share it). I feel less is more, and i'm usually still within my allowances.
moderation is what you make it out to be. - 4/27/2010 12:42:07 PM
I think 'moderation' changes with time. Pre-SparkPeople, a staple on the lunch menu was wings at my favourite wing place - Wild Wings. Probably ate there at least 2x per week.
When I decided to 'get sensible', I cut back to 1x/week. Then gradually, as my journey into healthier eating progressed, I cut back to even more. Now, I have wings about once per month.
'Moderation' is continuing to evolve for me...but I still like my wings, on occasion. - 2/18/2010 10:00:08 AM
Sometimes I think that as long as the treat fits into my nutrient ranges for the day it's fine. But there's been times where I tell myself that multiple days in a row, which is obviously not that healthy for me. However, I also try to decrease the portion sizes of my "treats". I will eat half a cookie or just part of something. When I do eat those things I also try to actually savor it instead of just gobbling it down. I think moderation is whatever you personally find acceptable for your given situation and activity level (being completely honest with yourself about what you're eating, how well you're eating healthy and how much you're exercising)
Today there were some "community" cookies at work. I must have walked by those things half a dozen times and every single time I wanted one. But I'm also self conscious of having other people see me eat bad things so it helped that people were around. I also went back to my desk and ate the apple I packed to try a sweet "alternative". I ate more of that apple than i've ever eaten of an apple before. haha. I still sorta want the cookie but this post and the fact that we went out to dinner Sunday night is keeping me from it. Thanks guys!
- 1/12/2010 5:16:54 PM
Since I log my foods, the ratio of healthy food to junk food is controlled. I simply don't have the calories to spend on a lot of junk food! I know very well that if I splurge on too much junk food, I'll end up being hungry, because those calories are empty and pretty useless for keeping you satisfied! - 12/23/2009 9:11:21 AM
All good questions but I think moderation is different for every person b/c each persons body is different as well as their goals. For me, moderation means that I eat healthy all the time but if Monday I want a fun snack, I have a fun snack, just 1 & that's it. Tuesday I might not want a fun snack, Wednesday I might, Thursday I might.
Never over induldge & never deprive, there is a safe middle ground & for 1 person might not be moderation for someone else. So 1 definition for all wouldn't work. - 9/9/2009 9:14:46 AM
- 8/22/2009 1:02:16 AM
When you eat junk food, you don't get or stay as full as you would when you eat healthier food. So to me, it's a question of how much of filling foods am I willing to give up to eat the junk food.
For example, if I have ice cream with lunch, it might mean I only get veggies for dinner because I used up calories from my bank toward that ice cream instead... its either that or I end up going over my daily calorie range.
So, I tend lean toward lower calorie versions instead. - 8/4/2009 3:41:16 PM
scribe4christ - 7/10/2009 11:01:49 PM
And that's my opinion. - 7/9/2009 4:48:26 PM
Please Log In To Leave A Comment: Log in now ›