Sweet Deception: Why You Can't Trust 'Sugar' Labels
Raise your hand if you think that sugar is bad for your health. Now keep your hand up if you try to avoid foods with added sugars. I’m guessing most still have their hands up (at least I would hope so). Here's one more question. Keep your hand up if you read the "Sugars" section of the Nutrition Facts label in order to determine how much sugar is in the foods you eat.
If your hand is still up, I've got some shocking news for you: That label doesn't mean a thing.
Although Nutrition Facts labels were designed to help consumers better understand the foods they buy, many people find them downright confusing. And the whole "sugar" issue is just one of many reasons why.
Those of you who are long-time members of SparkPeople.com, our parent site that features free calorie-tracking tools, may have noticed that SparkPeople flat out refuses to include "Sugars" (as in, that section from Nutrition Facts labels) on our Nutrition Tracker. People hem and haw about it because they want to track how much "sugar" they are eating. But we didn't allow the option because we know just how misleading that label is.
The "sugars" listed on a food label are NOT synonymous with "added sugars," although most people think that is exactly what it means. To understand what they truly are (a specific form of carbohydrate), here's a Nutrition 101 explanation for you.
Carbohydrates are a macronutrient (the other macronutrients are protein and fat) that your body uses to make glucose, which gives you energy for everything from thinking to exercising. Carbohydrates are found in many foods, including fruits, vegetables, breads, grains, dairy products, caloric sweeteners (everything from white sugar to corn syrup to agave nectar)—and the foods that contain them. Carbohydrates can further be categorized into two main types:
A better indication is to look for the various names of added sweeteners in the ingredients list. When it's within the top 3-5 ingredients, or listed multiple times on a list, you know it's a pretty heavily sweetened food. Still, that won't tell you just how much sugar it contains.
Confusing, right? That's why many consumer and health groups are advocating for food labels to tell us just how many grams of added sugars a food contains. That sure would make it easier to make comparisons, wouldn't it? That could help people avoid all the sweet stuff that we know is correlated to our increased girth and possibly to a host of other health problems as well? After all, the American Heart Association, the 2010 Dietary Guidelines, MyPlate.gov, and countless other groups recommend that consumers limit their intake of added sugars. Wouldn't such a label make it easier for them to do just that?
So recently, the FDA released plans to study how an "added sugar" label would affect consumer choices. They requested public comment on their plans to do this study. Here are some groups who publicly commented against the inclusion of "added sugars" on food labels:
Whether nutrition labels ever change in this case or not, you can access a USDA document of the added sugars in 2,000 foods by clicking here (PDF). And here's another little trick from SparkPeople's Dietitian Becky:
Learn More
15 Surprising Sources of Added Sugar
Breaking Your Sugar Addiction
The Truth about 'Natural' Sweeteners
This blog has been reviewed and approved by SparkPeople nutrition expert, Becky Hand, Licensed and Registered Dietitian.
Are you trying to limit your sugar intake? Would you like to see see "added sugars" on nutrition labels? Why or why not?
If your hand is still up, I've got some shocking news for you: That label doesn't mean a thing.
Although Nutrition Facts labels were designed to help consumers better understand the foods they buy, many people find them downright confusing. And the whole "sugar" issue is just one of many reasons why.
Those of you who are long-time members of SparkPeople.com, our parent site that features free calorie-tracking tools, may have noticed that SparkPeople flat out refuses to include "Sugars" (as in, that section from Nutrition Facts labels) on our Nutrition Tracker. People hem and haw about it because they want to track how much "sugar" they are eating. But we didn't allow the option because we know just how misleading that label is.
The "sugars" listed on a food label are NOT synonymous with "added sugars," although most people think that is exactly what it means. To understand what they truly are (a specific form of carbohydrate), here's a Nutrition 101 explanation for you.
Carbohydrates are a macronutrient (the other macronutrients are protein and fat) that your body uses to make glucose, which gives you energy for everything from thinking to exercising. Carbohydrates are found in many foods, including fruits, vegetables, breads, grains, dairy products, caloric sweeteners (everything from white sugar to corn syrup to agave nectar)—and the foods that contain them. Carbohydrates can further be categorized into two main types:
- Complex carbohydrates, including starch (which must be broken down during digestion before it can be used as glucose/energy) and fiber
- Simple carbohydrates, which include naturally-occurring "sugars" in unprocessed fruits, vegetables and dairy products, as well as added sugars
A better indication is to look for the various names of added sweeteners in the ingredients list. When it's within the top 3-5 ingredients, or listed multiple times on a list, you know it's a pretty heavily sweetened food. Still, that won't tell you just how much sugar it contains.
Confusing, right? That's why many consumer and health groups are advocating for food labels to tell us just how many grams of added sugars a food contains. That sure would make it easier to make comparisons, wouldn't it? That could help people avoid all the sweet stuff that we know is correlated to our increased girth and possibly to a host of other health problems as well? After all, the American Heart Association, the 2010 Dietary Guidelines, MyPlate.gov, and countless other groups recommend that consumers limit their intake of added sugars. Wouldn't such a label make it easier for them to do just that?
So recently, the FDA released plans to study how an "added sugar" label would affect consumer choices. They requested public comment on their plans to do this study. Here are some groups who publicly commented against the inclusion of "added sugars" on food labels:
- The American Bakers Association
- The American Beverage Association
- The Independent Bakers Association
- The National Confectioners Association
- The National Dairy Council
- The National Milk Producers Federation
- The Sugar Association
- The American Heart Association
- The Center for Science in the Public Interest
- Marion Nestle, PhD, MPH, Professor in the Department of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at New York University
- Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity
Whether nutrition labels ever change in this case or not, you can access a USDA document of the added sugars in 2,000 foods by clicking here (PDF). And here's another little trick from SparkPeople's Dietitian Becky:
"When you see 'grams' of sugar listed on a label, divide the number by 4. This will tell you how many teaspoons of sugar are in a food. Sure, it may not ALL be 'added' sugars, but in the case of sweet foods or treats, it's probably pretty accurate. This method reveals that a large soda or pastry contains 10 teaspoons of added sugar! Visualize eating that amount of sugar by the teaspoon—and you may just decide to skip that sweet treat after all."
Learn More
15 Surprising Sources of Added Sugar
Breaking Your Sugar Addiction
The Truth about 'Natural' Sweeteners
This blog has been reviewed and approved by SparkPeople nutrition expert, Becky Hand, Licensed and Registered Dietitian.
Are you trying to limit your sugar intake? Would you like to see see "added sugars" on nutrition labels? Why or why not?
![]() You will earn 3 SparkPoints |
NEXT ENTRY > What's the Difference Between Yoga and Pilates?
































Comments
I personally want to know how much TOTAL sugar my food contains because my body can not differentiate the difference between naturally occuring and added sugar - it needs to metabolize ALL the sugar contained in my food. When I hear people equate "naturally occuring" with "good for you" I cringe!!!
Education is what is needed NOT experts deciding for us what information we need to have or are capable of understanding. - 8/22/2012 9:52:36 PM
- 8/22/2012 3:49:09 PM
Sorry, it just gets annoying when people assume all of us don't understand such simple things. But, I guess if you are a site such as SparkPeople, you have to go with the lowest intelligence denominator, or you may be held liable for someone's foolish actions. - 8/21/2012 10:43:23 PM
It's not about assuming people are ignorant (though many people are ignorant about what all the items on a nutrition label mean), it's about being completely upfront with what is in your products. Just because you you make it clear what you have in your product does not mean you are trying to insult consumers and I think it's wrong to think of full disclosure as meaning that. - 8/20/2012 8:17:40 AM
Thank you fpr pointing this out. This is an article to be favorited and consulted. - 8/19/2012 8:29:16 PM
The less ingredients listed the better. so while I am cutting out processed foods I am really just cutting out majorly processed foods. Having the rest in moderation will be taken care of by our wonderful bodies. It can handle all kinds of stuff- including poison-- which of course the processed sugar is. The body can only deal with so much- the rest has to be stored until it can be processed by your body. Which is why not overloading your system is so important. - 8/18/2012 6:00:27 PM
It's also why I NEVER buy ANY commercial baked products. I won't eat lies or mysteries. - 8/18/2012 10:07:53 AM
--------------------------------
-----------------------------------
---------------------------
If you have ever struggled losing weight and keeping it off, you already know what a challenge that can be. Dr. Richard Johnson, chief of the Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension at the University of Colorado has published hundreds of articles and two books on this topic: The Sugar Fix, and most recently, The Fat Switch, which presents a groundbreaking approach to preventing and reversing obesity.
According to Dr. Johnson, based on his decades of research:
“Those of us who are obese eat more because of a faulty “switch” and exercise less because of a low energy state. If you can learn how to control the specific “switch” located in the powerhouse of each of your cells – the mitochondria – you hold the key to fighting obesity.”
- 8/18/2012 9:09:51 AM
The only living things that can make their own food are plants. Every other living thing has to eat plants or eat the eaters of plants. Fruits and vegetables are plants. They have fructose and other "sugars". Since the food plants make for themselves is a "sugar", everything else has this natural sugar in it. So cows make milk that has a "natural sugar" called lactose. Most of the things on labels ending in "-ose" are some form of "sugar". But you're right~ milk, fruits, and vegetables only have "sugar" because the sugars they have are not fats or proteins. Have to call it something. So it's sugar. But not "bad" sugar, unless you eat huge amounts of them.
We can still track sugars if we want. We can track anything by calling it an "exercise" or save it as an extra goal or even right on the food page by listing sugars as a group or individually, (depending on how OCD-ish we are), in "favorites", just as we list anything not found in the food search. We just have to be a little more creative in making it show on the reports. I just pick some extra nutrient I'm really not interested in and and use it as a code word for "sugars". I agree with "Cecilann" that it feels kind of patronizing for SP to assume we are all too innocent or ignorant to figure out what labels mean, especially when they enlighten us. They may as well make it impossible to log our weight every day if we choose to, because they think we should be forced to follow their advice not to weigh too often. Oh, wait.... they already do that.
Don't misunderstand~ I love all the advice and information on SP. I admire SP for giving us all these trackers and references and encouragement for FREE. I just like the freedom to make my own decisions based on the advice and information. - 8/17/2012 2:06:09 PM
I have to admit to being annoyed / frustrated by the idiocy of stuff that shows teaspoons of sugar for foods as if that, by default, makes it a BAD food. But, meh, I'll eat how I eat and they can eat how they eat.
I think having "Added sugars" -AND- "Added sweeteners" on the label would be great. I hate currently having to read through a list of ingredients to see if I can remember all the artificial sweeteners (caloric or "not") to avoid them. - 8/17/2012 1:54:20 PM
-- Less stress about the "goodness" of the food.
-- No worries about what ingredients are in it.
-- Self-confidence in your ability to manage your own health.
-- The satisfaction of making something with your own hands.
It is definitely worth the time and effort I have put in over the last few years to learn to grow, prepare, and store my own food. - 8/17/2012 12:50:01 PM
Having said that: hopes and prayers go out to California concerning the proposition to label gmo food. I pray it passes. "Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to decieve". - 8/17/2012 10:20:30 AM
Please Log In To Leave A Comment: Log in now ›