The Inauguration Luncheon, Slimmed Down
While most of us watched the Inauguration while munching on brown bag lunches or last night's leftovers, the new president and other dignitaries enjoyed a much more lavish feast yesterday.
After the oath, the speech and the parade, all the bigwigs at the Inauguration headed to a fancy multicourse luncheon. While the Obamas are reputed to be fairly healthful eaters, yesterday's meal was certainly a special-occasion meal.
According to the New York Examiner, "The nutritional toll per person for the three-course meal: 3,048 calories and 142 grams of fat – not including the wine and champagne that will accompany each course."
We took a look at the recipes from the luncheon and tried to find some approximate yet healthier versions. See what you think!
Their meal:
First course
Seafood Stew
631 calories; 32 g fat
Second course
Duck Breast with Cherry Chutney
Herb Roasted Pheasant with Wild Rice Stuffing
Molasses Whipped Sweet Potatoes
Winter Vegetables
1,534 calories; 77 g fat
Third course
Cinnamon Apple Sponge Cake
883 calories; 33 g fat
Our meal:
First course
Their Seafood Stew is topped with puff pastry (butter, white flour and not much else) and thickened by heavy cream. Opt for a tomato-based dish, swap half-and-half for the cream and leave off the puff pastry to slim down your version. You can also try one of these recipes for Seafood Stew
All of these recipes contain fewer than 300 calories/serving!
Second course
Duck and pheasant are rich, fatty meats. Try one of these duck recipes, with fewer than 200 calories a serving, or substitute a leaner bird, such as chicken or turkey.
For an easy version of the main dish, try topping grilled chicken with store-bought chutney.
Serve it with wild rice stuffing, mashed sweet potatoes (fewer than 100 calories a serving) and roasted winter vegetables.
Third course
Cinnamon-apple desserts for fewer than 100 calories a serving
What health and nutrition policy suggestions do you have for the new president?
After the oath, the speech and the parade, all the bigwigs at the Inauguration headed to a fancy multicourse luncheon. While the Obamas are reputed to be fairly healthful eaters, yesterday's meal was certainly a special-occasion meal.
According to the New York Examiner, "The nutritional toll per person for the three-course meal: 3,048 calories and 142 grams of fat – not including the wine and champagne that will accompany each course."
We took a look at the recipes from the luncheon and tried to find some approximate yet healthier versions. See what you think!
First course
Seafood Stew
631 calories; 32 g fat
Second course
Duck Breast with Cherry Chutney
Herb Roasted Pheasant with Wild Rice Stuffing
Molasses Whipped Sweet Potatoes
Winter Vegetables
1,534 calories; 77 g fat
Third course
Cinnamon Apple Sponge Cake
883 calories; 33 g fat
Our meal:
First course
Their Seafood Stew is topped with puff pastry (butter, white flour and not much else) and thickened by heavy cream. Opt for a tomato-based dish, swap half-and-half for the cream and leave off the puff pastry to slim down your version. You can also try one of these recipes for Seafood Stew
All of these recipes contain fewer than 300 calories/serving!
Second course
Duck and pheasant are rich, fatty meats. Try one of these duck recipes, with fewer than 200 calories a serving, or substitute a leaner bird, such as chicken or turkey.
For an easy version of the main dish, try topping grilled chicken with store-bought chutney.
Serve it with wild rice stuffing, mashed sweet potatoes (fewer than 100 calories a serving) and roasted winter vegetables.
Third course
Cinnamon-apple desserts for fewer than 100 calories a serving
What health and nutrition policy suggestions do you have for the new president?
![]() You will earn 3 SparkPoints |
NEXT ENTRY > 6 Ways to Exercise Like a Fitness Pro
































Comments
Duck? VERY rich. I tried it once in pho. A little goes a LONG way. The veggies and the sweet potatoes look interesting, though. Needs to be less meat and more greens.
And as for nutrition and health in an Obama administration? Fat is too often a poverty issue! Grocery stores and farmer's markets congregate in the affluent areas. Folks working for Wal-Mart wages end up grabbing top ramen or mac and cheese because they are cheap and quick. Beans and rice may be cheap, but they aren't very tasty on their own, nor are they fast-cooking. Fresh produce and healthier options like brown rice can be prohibitively expensive.
Add to this streets that you can't safely walk (crime, no sidewalk, or both) and parks that are not safe to exercise in, with crumbling community centers, and the problem gets worse. - 1/24/2009 6:34:21 AM
I'd have tucked in and enjoyed. - 1/23/2009 11:14:39 AM
I am surprised that pheasant is high in calories because I always thought it was like chicken. Haven't eaten it in years because pheasants became scarce in our area and I wouldn't think of buying it. - 1/22/2009 9:54:55 AM
None! Show me where the Constitution grants the President (or any other branch of government) any say in MY health and nutrition. - 1/21/2009 7:35:48 PM
The meal was based on a menu that Abraham Lincoln would have eaten ... you know the man WHO MADE BLACK PEOPLE FREE ... eat up and enjoy!
....especially the duck! - 1/21/2009 7:24:56 PM
A gym in every company. :)
Discounts for people who are trying to and living a healthy life style.
Make all foods affordable- meaning "good healthy food" - I have to say, eating healthy IS more expensive than eating badly. Even though many say otherwise.
OH, and this has nothing to do with policy but maybe it does. I'm so sick of people picking on other people who have weight problems. It's not funny and its rude. I find that happening more and more, (not to me) but in the media, and online. It's really sad. - 1/21/2009 7:06:12 PM
I would have had the phesant and veggies. I mean, if you really wanted to keep with the whole theme, not only was the meal caloric, but it was expensive!
Um, ..........I don't expect them to eat rice and beans, but......it did seem excessive, given the times we live in. Just sayin''............................
............... - 1/21/2009 7:01:59 PM
AND that meal for me was over the top. Its a good reminder how those calories can sneak in and cause me to break out in fat. 130 plus grams of fat in one meal...thats just rediculous. I agree that it would be nice if planners considered calories & fat when planning menus. i just lead a luncheon for 45 women over the weekend. in planning the menu - health was a factor and the women appreciated the effort. - 1/21/2009 6:56:44 PM
That aside, if Obama quit smoking he would be far healthier, even if he had that kind of lunch a couple of times a week.
Any health benefits he sees from a healthy diet is more than offset by all the carcinogens he sucks in. - 1/21/2009 2:17:45 PM
None, I don't believe it's the government's job to tell people what and how to eat.
BUT, I do believe that he is a very important role model and if he just uses his life as a personal example on what and how to eat and work out, it will have a positive impact. Using status/celebrity to set a good example is wonderful. Using status to bully others into doing what you do isn't. I'm sure he will set a good example. - 1/21/2009 2:06:10 PM
To give thema dvice I'd say Water, water, water. - 1/21/2009 1:29:19 PM
On top of that there are all those other opportunities to indulge that come up, just about everyday it sometimes seems. I’m talking the sudden appearance of a New York Cheesecake in your life and the thought that, “I can’t even remember the last time I had a slice of that.” “I haven’t walked into this restaurant for 8 months… or 8 years.” “Ooo look… a Maple Cream Egg I haven’t had one of those since last Easter.” And on and On… It’s just too, too much…
It’s a big problem and you can quote me…
We can’t indulge occasionally if we indulge at every occasion.
It’s hard to give up all those wonderfully rich foods that are a part of our lives or forgo every opportunity we have to indulge. It’s a real challenge to find satisfying alternatives.
Keep these posts coming because I know I need all the help I can get.
Sampling historic gourmet fare would be fun, especially given the extraordinary day… But it might be nice too if event coordinators start considering calories when they put together their menus. More often than not at least...
Even for someone who’s not inundated with similar civic and social functions, as the Obamas will obviously be over the next four years, these kinds of meals come up often enough to be a potential problem for any of us. Instead of the usual choice between Steak or Fish, it would be nice to have an honestly healthy choice. Vegetarian isn’t necessarily a safe option either because chefs are notoriously skilled at loading calories into anything. Even the winter vegetables were probably swimming in butter.
- 1/21/2009 1:06:54 PM
Please Log In To Leave A Comment: Log in now ›